judicial activism

Judges making policy

Judicial activism is a characterization of court rulings—especially by the Supreme Court—that critics believe overstep the proper bounds of judicial authority by making policy rather than interpreting law.

The term is almost always pejorative, used to accuse judges of imposing personal or political views rather than applying legal principles.

What counts as activism depends heavily on the accuser's perspective; both liberals and conservatives level the charge when courts reach decisions they oppose.

Critics called the ruling judicial activism that usurped legislative power.

conservative-critique

originalism

Interpreting by founding-era meaning

Scalia · legislating from the bench · activist judges · democratic accountability · states' rights · enumerated powers · original intent

liberal-advocacy

Warren Court

1953-1969 Supreme Court

equal protection · desegregation · criminal justice reform · voting rights · privacy rights · fundamental rights · social progress

controversy

separation of powers

Constitutional distribution of authority

court-packing · accountability · litmus tests · public trust

landmark-cases

Marbury v. Madison

Landmark ruling establishing judicial review

case law · court ruling · majority opinion · dissent · concurrence

policy-impact

social change

Transformation of collective behavior

injunctions · consent decrees · implementation · enforcement

Categories
Opposites
interpretive philosophy

judicial activismjudicial restraint

Courts avoiding activist rulings

originalism · textualism · literalism · strict interpretation · original intent

Family

prejudice, judicious, activism, judicial, judiciary, adjudicate, adjudication, prejudicial, adjudicator

Familiarity
Top 500,000
Profile
Mostly American · Timeless · Abstract · Rated G